Page 26 of 104

Posted: Wed 13th Jan 2010 11:33 am
by True Playa
Anyone know what the current top of the menu choices are at grey area? Anyone know if they are still selling headband?

Posted: Wed 13th Jan 2010 11:40 am
by Simon
last week they had no headband, i think top of the menu was sleestack, la woman and ko kush, also the recon was really nice

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 01:28 pm
by seanlyall
Didnt have my Grey berry or the mist so I went with the Yellow cab and the LA Confidencial.

LA was good and the Cab was a good bong hit but a harsh joint.

greay area

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 03:36 pm
by martin green
all medium quality there :S i would even say- crappy .

peace

Re: greay area

Posted: Sat 16th Jan 2010 11:07 pm
by Stanky Danky
martin green wrote:all medium quality there :S i would even say- crappy .

peace
Care to be a little more specific? I doubt you've had all the menu has to offer.

grey

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 10:38 am
by martin green
i haven't, but it was enough to see that La Confidential and KO Kush were crap...

peace

Re: grey

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 11:08 am
by ZBeebs
martin green wrote:i haven't, but it was enough to see that La Confidential and KO Kush were crap...

peace
You only saw it, didn't smoke it? How is this even relevant then?

Re: greay area

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 11:36 am
by Sir Niall of Essex-sire
martin green wrote:all medium quality there :S i would even say- crappy .

peace
My views of G.A mirror this.

Although there are some good buds there, the prices put me off, just as good quality can get found else where.

Re: greay area

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 11:43 am
by ZBeebs
Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:
martin green wrote:all medium quality there :S i would even say- crappy .

peace
My views of G.A mirror this.

Although there are some good buds there, the prices put me off, just as good quality can get found else where.
First you say you agree with the statement "all medium quality there / crappy" but then go on to say the bud is good but it's really the prices you take issue with.

Stoners are so confusing :D

Re: greay area

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 11:48 am
by Sir Niall of Essex-sire
ZBeebs wrote:
Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:
martin green wrote:all medium quality there :S i would even say- crappy .

peace
My views of G.A mirror this.

Although there are some good buds there, the prices put me off, just as good quality can get found else where.
First you say you agree with the statement "all medium quality there / crappy" but then go on to say the bud is good but it's really the prices you take issue with.

Stoners are so confusing :D
Not really.

Low quality = shit buds. Medium quality = good buds. High quality = high quality buds/awesome buds.

I said the prices put me off the good buds, as good quality can be found else where for better.

Stoners, some dont read properly.

Re: grey

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 11:50 am
by Stanky Danky
martin green wrote:i haven't, but it was enough to see that La Confidential and KO Kush were crap...

peace
Fair enough, but I think you have to try more than two strains to conclude everything on the menu is crappy.

Re: grey

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 12:00 pm
by Sir Niall of Essex-sire
martin green wrote:i haven't, but it was enough to see that La Confidential and KO Kush were crap...

peace
I think Boner said the LA Con in Katsu is rocking at the moment.

Re: greay area

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 12:06 pm
by ZBeebs
Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:
ZBeebs wrote:
Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote: My views of G.A mirror this.

Although there are some good buds there, the prices put me off, just as good quality can get found else where.
First you say you agree with the statement "all medium quality there / crappy" but then go on to say the bud is good but it's really the prices you take issue with.

Stoners are so confusing :D
Not really.

Low quality = shit buds. Medium quality = good buds. High quality = high quality buds/awesome buds.

I said the prices put me off the good buds, as good quality can be found else where for better.

Stoners, some dont read properly.
I read just fine, its your arbitrary use of bad/good/great and the expectation that I should automatically understand your personal rating system that caused the confusion. You are stating that good buds = mid quality. If someone sold me "good" buds and it was only mids, I'd be pissed!

Re: grey

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 12:10 pm
by Boner
Sir Niall of Essex-sire wrote:
martin green wrote:i haven't, but it was enough to see that La Confidential and KO Kush were crap...

peace
I think Boner said the LA Con in Katsu is rocking at the moment.
OG18.

Re: greay area

Posted: Sun 17th Jan 2010 12:31 pm
by Sir Niall of Essex-sire
ZBeebs wrote:
I read just fine, its your arbitrary use of bad/good/great and the expectation that I should automatically understand your personal rating system that caused the confusion. You are stating that good buds = mid quality. If someone sold me "good" buds and it was only mids, I'd be pissed!
I apologise for not being responsible for your interpretations :roll:

Sorry Boner, my bad.